Thursday, January 29, 2009

World to get first ever gay leader

Change can happen, that is what a Sirasa News First billboard said. Yes it really do. Just weeks after americas first black president took oath, it seems like Iceland will have an openly gay women as it's head. What you want in a leader is the ability to lead, not a specific sexual orientation.

Here is the complete story.

9 comments:

ape logic said...

"What you want in a leader is the ability to lead, not a specific sexual orientation."
ability to lead is somewhat closely connected with the sexual orientation. The exact contrary of your opinion, or at least, often.

Liberal Lanka said...

can you please explain more how ability to lead is closely connected with the sexual orientation?

Sam said...

May be “ape logic” have point here. May be gay people are better as leaders. Come to think of it, most of the religious leaders are gay or at least appears to be gay. Take an example, Ted Haggard. Gay! Take Pope, well, he may not gay (I don’t care even if he is). But he wears funny dresses and funny hats. And those shoes! On my God!
Then how about 7 Caesars, who had utter most admiration to pretty guys too.

ape logic said...

Being a homosexual is a drawback for a leader because there is no sex drive to conquer to dominate or to challenge the dominance.
But, on the other hand it could be the axle of a dominant leader when he tries to hide his sexual incapability as a classic masculine male.

History is the evidence,

Hitler did have only one testicle
Napoleons penis was crooked and extra small(xs)
Mussolini was a total disaster in bed with his secret Jewish lover
Ranil is a total failure
Rumors about Pirapaharan for pedofilic act on child soldiers.
Recently died Austrian fascist leader Jörg Haider was a passive homosexual who invented most of the discriminative laws against his own kind (homosexuals)
The exception that confirms the rule can not be applied here as Sam says, just because there were few great gay leaders that never ever indicate they are the best. Only thing is they standout from the mass for being "the odds"
The pope (current) is not definitely a good leader, he has offended Islam and other non Cristian beliefs as the first step in his career. Now he is engaged in the process of beatification of 19th-century pope Pius XII branded as anti-Semitic. There are rumors that pope is a pedofilic but not gay. All that are rumors and there are no good evidence.
And we should never forget when it comes to POPE, people expect him to be the representative, the protector of the morals and ethics the church & co; itself invented. That's why a priest in love with a woman make much noise (a scandal) than a common man.

Sam said...

// Being a homosexual is a drawback for a leader because there is no sex drive to conquer to dominate or to challenge the dominance.//
it is not true to say, homosexuals do not have sex drive.

It is not the sex drive that drives a man/woman to be a leader. Gandhi may be the world best leader, no sex drive.

If it is that sort of challenge make people to be good leaders, Arabs should have being world best leaders, because in a polygamist society men have to challenge the dominance aggressively to get a woman.

Desmond Morris wrote in length what drives a human to be a leader or make us be rich and successful, at least according to him it is not sex.

Liberal Lanka said...

ape logic,
What is the logic behind saying that homosexuals have no sex drive. if they did not have any sex drive they would not be called homosexuals. Maybe homosexuals have a higher sex drive simply because they lack in opportunities.

Also i don't see any reason why a good leader should have a sex drive. Maybe you are talking about a wild elephant herd, I am talking about civilizations.

TheWhacksteR said...

Sam - theres a difference between 'aooearing gay' and 'being gay' one is sexual orientation and the other is PERCEPTION. and its YOUR perception!


and Ape logic - Homosexuals dont have a sex drive? tell that to the vatican or the warlords of afghanistan!

sheesh

Anonymous said...

>> Being a homosexual is a drawback for a leader because there is no sex drive to conquer to dominate or to challenge the dominance.

Wow. That was a spectacularly stupid comment.

Do you know the difference between the terms Heterosexual, Homosexual, Bisexual, Pansexual and Asexual?

Of course, if you had at least one gay friend you wouldn't say something like that...

And as Sam pointed out let's not forget the Caesars.. Alexander the Great... and the Spartans...and the Vikings too...

Anonymous said...

Yes if the truth be known, in some moments I can reveal that I jibe consent to with you, but you may be considering other options.
to the article there is stationary a without question as you did in the go over like a lead balloon a fall in love with efflux of this demand www.google.com/ie?as_q=video edit magic 4.27 ?
I noticed the catch-phrase you suffer with not used. Or you functioning the pitch-dark methods of development of the resource. I suffer with a week and do necheg