Tuesday, January 26, 2010

I'm sorry for you SittingNut

The latest finding of SittingNut is the fact that Fonseka alliance is an unholy alliance and all those who are supporting him are evil. That all the 'good people' would go and vote for Mahinda Rajapakshe to defeat evil. For a moment I was wondering whether this was meant as a joke or not. Even hate mongers like Hudson Samarasinghe or Wimal Weerawansa don't stoop to this level.

The irony is that this is the same person who called the president a buffalo, more insanely the supporters of the president as the buffalo herd. He used this insult each and every time to the president in a sarcastic way but rarely uses it now and when reminded, cheaply claims something on the line that buffalo was meant as both favorably and unfavorably. He doesn't acknowledge he made a mistake in judging Mahinda or an explanation on why he used to call him that insult each and every time but is not using now unless reminded.

But maybe we shouldn't be concerned about these hate mongering claims. Maybe SittingNut doesn't mean something bad when he calls Fonseka camp as the evil unholy alliance or Mahinda supporters as good people. Maybe one day when he religiously chooses another political camp he will say that what he meant as the evil unholy alliance was something both favourable and unfavorable and actually not something so evil.

5 comments:

sittingnut said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
sittingnut said...

lol@ confused hate directed me .

by a person who left a load of unanswered questions about obvious lies he uttered there as does here .


fact is i get things right, he wrong.

instead of dealing with it, if he wants to hate me for that, he is free to.

lol

Anonymous said...

Sitting Nut who claims he always mentions facts have left a fact less cheap answer. Good expose.

Bardo Flanks said...

This is what I think. Sittingnut is a very principled person. The problem is that when he started blogging, he was working with the likes of Morquendi and Lastnode, both peaceniks. The peer pressure got to him, and he had to tag along.

When he finally broke free and started deviating from the peacenik gospel, they turned against him very viciously, and he was pushed to the other extreme.

I don't think he's an SLFP or JHU supporter. It's just that his former friends hate him so much, that he really doesn't have the option of being moderate when his opponents are from such extremes.

What I really like about Snut is that he backs up everything he says with evidence. He's not afraid to offend other people. He has never ever said anything racist, but he's exposed the racism of the peacenik ngots.

That said, I'm not happy with his answer here.

Liberal Lanka said...

//The problem is that when he started blogging, he was working with the likes of Morquendi and Lastnode, both peaceniks.

Yes he doesn't accept this as well.

//I don't think he's an SLFP or JHU supporter. It's just that his former friends hate him so much, that he really doesn't have the option of being moderate when his opponents are from such extremes.

spot on. He chooses a political camp and then protects it religiously just like his opponents.

There are some intimidation going on( hard to stop these) specially in hambantota against JVP supporters after the elections. Things like these won't help the situation like this. Calling evil for a political belief? That is not so libertarian.